Published:

15 ene 2022 15:09 GMT

The Spanish tennis player said that in the end he was “a little tired” of the controversy surrounding the Serbian player because he considers that “it is important to talk about our sport, about tennis.”

The Spanish tennis player Rafael Nadal has spoken about the situation that faces Novak Djokovic, who is at risk of being deported and being left out of the Australian Open, which begins in Melbourne next Monday.

“There is one thing very clear, Novak Djokovic is one of the best players in history,” Nadal said at his press conference on Saturday after his morning training session with American Taylor Fritz. “But there is no player in history that is more important than an event, because the players stay and then they leave, and other players arrive. Nobody, not Roger [Federer], Novak [Djokovic] or myself, or Bjorn Borg, who was incredible in his time… tennis goes on,” said the tennis player.

In his statements, Nadal asserted that “the Australian Open is much more important than any player.” “Yes [Djokovic] finally play will be fine; if not, the tournament will be a great tournament, with or without him,” he said. The tennis player express that in the end it was already “a little tired” of the controversy surrounding the Serbian player because, in his opinion “it is important to talk about our sport, about tennis”.

“If he plays everything, perfect; but if not, too. I wish him the best, we have done great things together for the circuit”, concluded the spanish star “I really respect him, even if I don’t agree with a lot of things he’s done in the last few weeks,” he said.

It should be remembered that Djokovic was arrested this day by the Australian border authorities, one day after he was your visa will be canceled for the second time for health reasons. This time it was Australia’s Immigration Minister, Alex Hawke, who chose to use his executive power this Friday and personally cancel the Serb’s visa, despite the fact that the athlete earlier this week won the court case against the previous annulment.

Hawke announced that the resolution was guided by “reasons of health and good order, on the grounds that it was in the public interest to do so”.





Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply